TURNING POINTS
Executive Order 9066 and the Cost of Military Exclusion
In 1942, a broadly worded presidential order gave the Army power to remove Japanese Americans from the West Coast. The policy’s consequences lasted decades beyond the war.
Executive Order 9066 did not name Japanese Americans, but it gave the military authority used to remove and incarcerate more than 120,000 people. The federal government formally apologized decades later.
On March 30, 1942, Japanese American families on Bainbridge Island, Washington, became the first civilians ordered out under the new West Coast exclusion policy. Their removal marked the beginning of a system that uprooted more than 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry. [1][6]
President Franklin D. Roosevelt had signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. The order did not name Japanese Americans. It authorized the secretary of war and military commanders to designate military areas and exclude people from them. Military authorities used that broad power to remove Japanese Americans from the West Coast. [1]
A Broad Order, Applied to One Community
The attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, intensified fears of another attack on the Pacific Coast. In the days that followed, federal authorities arrested some Japanese American community leaders. But the removal policy that followed did not depend on individual accusations against the families ordered to leave. [6]
Lt. Gen. John L. DeWitt's Western Defense Command put the policy into effect. On March 2, 1942, DeWitt established Pacific Coast Military Area No. 1. Congress added criminal enforcement through Public Law 503, enacted March 21, which made violations of military exclusion orders a federal misdemeanor. [6]
More than 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry were removed and incarcerated through the wartime program. About two-thirds were U.S. citizens by birth. [1]
The scale of the policy matters because it was not directed at a small group of people charged with specific acts. It treated ancestry as the basis for removal.
From the Coast to Inland Camps
Families had to leave homes, farms, businesses, and belongings behind or dispose of them under pressure. Many first went to temporary assembly centers. At Santa Anita, a California racetrack, thousands waited for transfer in facilities that included converted horse stalls. They were then sent to 10 major War Relocation Authority camps in remote inland locations. [6]
The language used for these sites remains contested. Government records often used “internment” and “relocation,” while many historians and descendants use “incarceration” to emphasize that most of those confined were never individually accused or tried. Whatever term is used, the central fact remains: the federal government confined people because of their ancestry.
At Manzanar and other camps, Japanese Americans lived in barracks under military authority. The official rationale was military security. In 1982, however, the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians concluded that the policy was not justified by military necessity. The commission found no Japanese American on the West Coast had committed espionage or sabotage during the war. [3]
That finding does not erase the fear Americans felt after Pearl Harbor. It does show the distance between fear and proof—and the harm caused when a government treats a population as a category rather than as individuals.
The Supreme Court's Contradictory Day
Fred Korematsu challenged the exclusion policy after refusing to report for removal. On December 18, 1944, the Supreme Court upheld his exclusion conviction in *Korematsu v. United States*. Justice Hugo Black wrote the majority opinion. [4]
That same day, the Court decided *Ex parte Endo*. Mitsuye Endo, a California state employee held at Topaz, had challenged her confinement through a habeas corpus petition. The Court ruled that the government could not continue to detain a concededly loyal citizen indefinitely. [4]
The decisions revealed a stark contradiction. The Court permitted Korematsu's exclusion from his home while limiting the government's power to keep loyal citizens confined. The War Department had announced the end of West Coast exclusion orders on December 17, just before the rulings were issued. [4]
A Long Road to Redress
The end of the war did not bring an immediate national accounting. In 1948, Congress created a process for certain evacuation-related property claims, but it was not a full remedy for the losses caused by removal and incarceration. [2]
On February 19, 1976, the 34th anniversary of Executive Order 9066, President Gerald Ford issued Proclamation 4417, terminating the order. [2]
The 1982 commission report provided a clear official judgment on the policy's causes. It concluded that exclusion and incarceration resulted from “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership,” not military necessity. [3]
President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act on August 10, 1988. The law offered a formal apology and authorized $20,000 payments to surviving people who had been incarcerated. Congress acknowledged that a grave injustice had been done. [5]
The payments could not restore lost property or undo years spent in confinement. They did establish that the federal government could acknowledge a civil-liberties violation and provide redress to people it had harmed.
Why Executive Order 9066 Still Matters
Executive Order 9066 was not merely a wartime administrative measure. It showed how quickly rights can be narrowed when officials treat an entire population as a potential threat and do not demand evidence tied to individuals.
The 1988 apology did not settle every question raised by the incarceration. It did reject the idea that the policy was an acceptable use of wartime power. Its continuing lesson is plain: national security does not remove the government's duty to treat people as individuals with rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Executive Order 9066 do?
Signed on February 19, 1942, the order authorized the secretary of war and military commanders to establish military areas and exclude people from them. It did not name Japanese Americans, but military authorities used it to remove Japanese Americans from the West Coast. [1]
How many people were incarcerated under the wartime program?
More than 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry were removed and incarcerated. About two-thirds were U.S. citizens by birth. [1]
How did the federal government apologize?
President Ford terminated Executive Order 9066 in 1976. In 1988, President Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, which included a formal apology and authorized $20,000 payments to surviving people who had been incarcerated. [2][5]
TIMELINE
Key moments
Sources
- Executive Order 9066: Resulting in Japanese-American Incarceration (1942) — National Archives and Records Administration
- World War II Japanese American Incarceration: Post-War Legacy — National Archives and Records Administration
- Personal Justice Denied: Report of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians — U.S. Capitol Visitor Center / National Archives
- Korematsu v. United States: 80 Years Later — The National WWII Museum
- Japanese American Reparations Topic Guide — Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
- Pearl Harbor and Executive Order 9066 — National Park Service - Manzanar National Historic Site
RELATED STORIES